Want to know:
passenger domiciled in State A has brought a federal diversity action in State A against a railroad, seeking damages for injuries suffered when the railroad's train, which the passenger boarded in State A, derailed in State B. railroad is incorporated and has its principal place of business in State B and operates in States A and B. Several other passengers were also injured and have brought individual actions in State B federal court.Railroad has moved the State A federal court to transfer the action to the State B federal district court. State B has only one federal district.What is the railroad's best argument in support of the motion?A. accident occurred in State B and many witnesses are located there.B. action involves common questions of fact with similar actions pending inState B.C. railroad is incorporated and has its principal place of business in State B.D. Venue is not proper in State A.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Joe, a Massachusetts citizen (from the Eastern District of Massachusetts), is in a car accident with two other cars while driving in Canada. Joe sues the drivers of the two other cars, Dina (from the Southern District of New York) and Devin (from Canada). Joe files suit in the S.D.N.Y. Joe alleges damages in excess of $75,000. Where would venue be proper?A.The Southern District of New York.B.Canada.C.Eastern District of Massachusetts.D.A and B.E.There is no available venue under these facts.
- All collateral promises must be in writing to be enforceable.
- Legal Concepts34) If there is a confidential relationship between persons, any contract made by the servientparty that benefits the dominant party is presumed to be entered into under undue influence.