Back to Questions
Want to know:
Legal Concepts4Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.20) Mitigation of damages is a nonbreaching party's legal duty toward avoiding or reducingdamages caused by a breach of contract.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- A landscaper from State A sued a homeowner from State B in a state court in State B.The landscaper is seeking $100,000 as compensation for tortious injuries caused by the homeowner's allegedly negligent acts in State B. The homeowner filed a notice of removal in the federal court in State B. The landscaper filed a motion to remand to the state court.Should the court grant the landscaper's motion to remand?A No, because the federal court may use supplemental jurisdiction to establish subject-matter jurisdiction.B No, because the federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction under the diversity statute.C Yes, because the homeowner is a citizen of State B, the state in which the action was brought.D Yes, because the notice of removal should have been filed in state court.
- True/False: not every promise is legally enforceable
- Jason (North Carolina) was alternating between playing Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis while flying his rocket pack. He got into an accident with Euripides (South Carolina), who was out hang gliding. When they collided, the Sega Genesis began leaking out acid which burned through the hang glider, causing Euripides to have to bail out. As soon as he landed, he contacted his lawyer and sued Jason for negligence and asserted $100,000 in damages. Jason impleaded McCollum Electronic Repairs, Inc., which has its principal place of business, and is incorporated in, South Carolina, under Rule 14. Jason claimed that in repairing his Sega Genesis, McCollum Electronic Repairs inserted acid into the console. Subsequently, Euripides amended his complaint to file a $50,000 negligence claim against McCollum Electronic Repairs, which then filed a motion to dismiss Euripides's claim against it. Under Kroger, what result?A.Granted because hearing the claim violates Article III §2.B.Denied because hearing the claim does not violate Article III §2.C.Granted because hearing the claim violates 28 U.S.C. §1332.D.Denied because it would be most efficient to hear all these related claims at once.