Want to know:
a electornic prescription is transferring
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Sparky adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- normally the absolute defense against a defamation charge
- Select the statement that best describes the relationship between removal and venue:A: In a properly removed case, venue is proper in the federal court of the state where the case was pending, even if venue would have been improper had the plaintiff originally filed the action in the federal district court of that stateB: In a properly removed case, venue is proper in the federal court of the state where the case was pending, but only if venue would have been proper had the plaintiff originally filed the action in the federal district court of that stateC: Venue and removal have no correlation
- Ryan was born and raised in North Carolina. At 18, he goes off to college in New York. After four years, he graduates and he gets a four-year contract to work at a New Jersey video game company after which time he plans to see how he likes the company and living in New Jersey. At the end of the contract, he's in the middle of applying for a one year government fellowship in Michigan at which point he plans to look for another permanent position, this time in California. While still living in New Jersey, he gets into a hang gliding accident (he's playing a game on his laptop at the same time he is steering the hang glider) and crashes into Cordelia (domiciled in North Carolina). After he moves to Michigan for the fellowship, Cordelia sues him for $100,000 in Michigan federal court. Working with a neighbor, you need to decide whether there would be diversity jurisdiction in this case. You should consider both Mas v. Perry and Gordon v. Steele in formulating your answer.